San Francisco Opera’s ‘Ring’ cycle is ambitious, brilliant

By Philip Kennicott,June 20, 2011
  • Mark Delavan (Wotan) and Nina Stemme (Brunhilde) with the Valkyries in The Valkyries at the San Francisco Opera.
Mark Delavan (Wotan) and Nina Stemme (Brunhilde) with the Valkyries in… (Cory Weaver/San Francisco…)

SAN FRANCISCO — It was going to be an American “Ring,” a vision of Wagner’s epic four-part operatic cycle “The Ring of the Nibelung” seen through the lens of American culture. But the Wagner production that had its genesis at the Washington National Opera in 2003, and came to a thrilling conclusion Sunday afternoon at the San Francisco Opera, became much more than an overlay of American imagery on a 19th-century spectacle of gods, dwarfs, men and magic talismans. It is now one of the best “Ring” cycles in more than a quarter of a century.

And that bodes well for opera in Washington. The director of this production, Francesca Zambello, is the newly appointed artistic adviser of the Washington National Opera. If she has real power in that role, and if the WNO can muster the financial support that her vision deserves, the embattled company could finally do great work.

Elements of Zambello’s American “Ring” were already present in a production of “The Valkyrie” she staged at Constitution Hall, where the company was in residence during 2003 renovations of the Kennedy Center Opera House. Video played a major role in that first, trial run at the larger cycle, but that was in part because the temporary stage at Constitution Hall couldn’t accommodate much three-dimensional action.

The production was a success, and it built momentum for the company to undertake a full “Ring” cycle in collaboration with the San Francisco Opera. Over the past few years, the Washington Opera has added the cycle’s prologue, “The Rhinegold” (in 2006) and a new version of “The Valkyrie” (in 2007). But then the economic crisis hit, and in 2008 the company announced that “Siegfried” (staged in 2009), would be the last of the series.

That meant no production of the cycle’s conclusion, “Gotterdammerung,” in Washington (though a concert performance was given). But the San Francisco Opera, which co-produced the first three installments, forged ahead and is presenting the complete cycle. Washington opera lovers are missing something extraordinary.

Along the way, everything about the American “Ring” got better, even as its putative American theme became less and less important to the production’s impact. Wagner lived with his characters — the gods Wotan and Fricka, Brunhilde the Valkyrie warrior, the twins Siegmund and Sieglinde and their child, the hero Siegfried — for almost 30 years before he staged the first full “Ring” at Bayreuth in 1876. The years that Zambello has lived with them while putting together her cycle has deepened her understanding of their motivations and emotions to an almost uncanny degree. There may be better-sung “Ring” cycles, and some productions may be more visually impressive. But there is not a more nuanced and intelligent “Ring” cycle around.

Embracing the myth

Wagner, who wrote his own libretto, combined three basic narrative threads in the “Ring”: the brutal competition to have and hold a cursed ring, which makes its bearer all-powerful; the downfall of the gods, who purport to rule by law and contract but often resort to theft and subterfuge; and the romance of two couples, Siegmund and Sieglinde, and Siegfried and Brunhilde, who chose love in the face of despair, destruction and fear of an unknown future. The title of the cycle — “The Ring of the Nibelung” — suggests where Wagner placed his emphasis, but many directors, perhaps self-conscious about the bad odor of J.R.R. Tolkien and his tales of a magic ring, seem embarrassed by that strand of the story.

Not Zambello, who has brought it to the fore, focusing unusual attention on the battle for power between Wotan and his nemesis, the dwarf Alberich, who forges the mysterious and cursed ring. This emphasis on the struggle for power gives the cycle philosophical heft, it raises the stakes for all the characters — the world itself is in peril — and while it is the most abstract of Wagner’s concerns, it intensifies all his other story lines. Long scenes that can be excruciatingly dull — Wagner’s recapitulations focus particularly on the fate of the ring — suddenly take on vitality and urgency in Zambello’s production.

And perhaps no part of the “Ring” cycle is so suddenly relevant, so ready-made for recasting in American terms, as Wagner’s depiction of an epic power struggle. Economic collapse, environmental degradation, decayed infrastructure, all have their roots in greed, self-interest and the blind quest for status and power. Zambello’s production represents it all: Act 2 of “Valkyrie” takes place under a crumbling highway overpass; Act 1 of “Siegfried” is set in a grubby trailer; and the nouveaux riches of “Gotterdammerung” live in the architecture of Joan Didion’s California with trimmings by Crate & Barrel.

The American way

Loading...

Comments