HBO’s ‘Girls’: Smartly cracking Gen Y’s morose code

By Hank Stuever,April 13, 2012
(Page 2 of 3)

After the no-more-money dinner with her parents ends badly, Dunham’s Hannah returns to the Brooklyn walk-up she shares with Marnie Michaels (played by Allison Williams). Their British college friend, Jessa Johansson (played by Jemima Kirke), has returned to New York after a long absence, crashing at the Target-splurged, color-coordinated apartment belonging to her younger cousin, a pampered college student named Shoshanna Shapiro (Zosia Mamet).

It’s tempting to view these four women in New York through the prism of that formative HBO juggernaut of the ’00s, “Sex and the City.” Shoshanna watches cable TV all day and still classifies everyone’s personality by archetypal analogue to that show. “I think I’m definitely like a Carrie at heart,” Shoshanna tells Jessa, who is too cool to admit ever having seen the show. “You’re definitely like a Carrie with some Samantha aspects and Charlotte hair. That’s like a really good combination.” Shoshanna says it flatly, almost mournfully, like a disciple who now doubts the gospel.

All of these women project such eloquent vibes of sadness and uncertainty. The authentic tone of “Girls” bluntly separates them from all the “Whitney,” “2 Broke Girls” and Zooey Deschanel bunk, or worse, the reality TV stories delivered in the Kim Kardashian “vocal fry” speech patterrrrnnnnnn that typifies young women on TV these days. Next to “Girls,” all those shows together amount to not much more than a Pinterest collage. I do not anticipate a time when young women will be trying to decide if they’re a Jemma or a Marnie or a Hannah.

One curious note: In addition to Dunham, each of the actors in “Girls” is the daughter of a boldface name — Allison Williams’s father is NBC News anchor Brian Williams; Kirke is the daughter of the drummer of Bad Company; Mamet is the daughter of the playwright David Mamet. Knowing these things has a way of making “Girls” that much more intriguing, and that much more annoying, as an already-narrow realm gets slightly more insular. It’s a little bit like the Sofia Coppola effect — which on the whole is a good effect.

And yet “Girls” — which is very pointedly not titled “Women” — has more to tell us than how lousy the job market is or how high the rent is in Brooklyn. It’s an intelligent, if microcosmic, depiction of a very certain sliver of life as it’s currently being experienced by four young, educated, white females. Like Mike Nichols’s “The Graduate,” Allen’s “Annie Hall” and Richard Linklater’s “Slacker,” “Girls” has potential to become a once-in-a-generation work that helps define a shared era.

This is not easygoing TV. Very often, the lies and disdain and explicit sex are about as appealing as the cervical scrape Hannah gets at the free clinic. As television, “Girls” is disturbing, sharply honed and even wickedly funny. Depending on where the show goes (HBO supplied just the first three out of 10 episodes for this review) and what it ultimately conveys, “Girls” could potentially affect our perceptions of feelings toward Generation Y.

The technology they’ve mind-melded with is not making things easier, it’s making things more frazzled and panicky. And the sex has become so porn-derived that Hannah’s romantic encounters (with an indifferent hipster brute played by Adam Driver) cast her in the role of willing receptacle.

With her willingness to bare her pudgy, tattoodled body, Dunham has been described as “unconventionally pretty,” which is one way of putting it. Perhaps the most striking thing about “Girls” is its willingness to leave “TV pretty” behind. All that talk about the “real women” who are seldom seen in pop-culture portrayals is not just talk. Dunham’s work differs in that it’s about young mundane people in all their young mundane-ness.

Dunham’s stories also have something to say about the older adults who loom almost menacingly — the parents, editors, authors, documentarians, painters and gallery owners who got in just under the wire, before the 21st-century economic maelstrom shifted the American dream. “Girls” is about a culture in which there just isn’t enough satisfaction to go around anymore. It is partly an indictment of upper-middle-class entitlement, and yet it also demands that its own entitlements be acknowledged, recognized and grieved. When Hannah deigns to ask for a salary at her internship, her boss fires her. “When you get hungry enough, you’ll figure it out,” he said.

“Do you mean physically hungry or hungry enough for the job?” she asks.

Loading...

Comments